Saturday, 25 June 2016

Purpose of Life

                         

    "Meri zindagi ka ek-kahi maksad hei. Badla !!"

                                                                                                                             - Sardar Khan(Gangs of Wasseypur)



This, seemingly just, catharsis had an unexpected effect on me. It shrugged me from my dogmatic slumber and forced me to ponder over some of the most fundamental and yet most overlooked questions of our lives.

Should the thirst for vengeance or of other negative emotions be the driving force of one’s life?
 If not, then what should be the raison d’etre of one’s existence? 
Is it necessary to have a purpose in life in the first place?
 Was our birth just result of a mechanical process of reproduction, an inconsequential cog in the cycle of genetic evolution? 
To look for answers would mean keeping aside all our established opinions, attitudes, standards of morality and starting afresh into the unknown waters.


About 200,000 years ago homo sapiens started evolving in a hostile environment. In a surrounding where other organisms were bigger and more ferocious. The challenge to our ancestor’s was to survive through another dark and dreary night. Existence itself seems to be the purpose of their lives. It’s saddening to see that today in spite of no imminent danger to life people commit suicides on trivial issues showing utter disregard to our ancestral value of survival.

Animals also seem to live with the purpose of survival. Is then to exist itself be the reason to be born. By this logic even the so called non-living things serve the purpose of life by existing.
 Is there, and more importantly, should there be any difference between a modern man’s and animal’s purpose of existence? 
Are we just condemned to live?
 The differentiating factor between an animal and a man is the power to reason. Thus mere surviving might not be the optimum use of this facility. 

Then, it seems to realize and actualize one’s power to think and reason should be the purpose of life. The whole superstructure of modern education is built on this belief. This idea has also strengthened the survival of humans by providing higher life expectancy, better medical care etc. But this untrammeled triumph of reason has produced some unsavory effects.

Apart from the usage of man’s rational ability in production of weapons of mass destruction, creating havocs for environment there is another sinister side of this multifaceted ability. It has made man more self-centric, this has led to growth of unhealthy competition, jealousy, vengeance etc. Should then actualization of reason be the purpose of life?


Theists say that reason isn’t intrinsic to man, rather it is a gift from God to help man realize the Omnipotent. The purpose of life they say is to realize the supernatural entity. Mother Teresa realized this purpose via serving the lepers in streets of Kolkata. Ram Krishna Paramhans used to say that service to mankind is service to God. But it does not absolve religion of the fact that there are certain lumpen elements in them who do certain things to realize a certain God. Wars fought in the name of religion, self-inflicted pain, child and animal sacrifice are some grave violations which cast clouds of doubt on the horizons of theistic logic. Is then the realization of God/supernatural entity be the purpose of life?

There can be a contradictory view also which discards other worldliness and focuses on here and now. This view lays a high premium on an individual’s life. Worth of life is to be measured not in the years lived, but the life lived in those years.  Majority of us today subscribe to one or the other variant of this line of thinking.  

Its grossest form would be giving up the reigns of mental control over the bodily senses and succumbing to all ephemeral desires. Since there is no afterlife, the purpose of life should be enjoying this life to the fullest. Eat, Drink and be Merry for you may die tomorrow. Although this seems very attractive, but after some deliberation we realize that actually it turns a man into a slave of his cravings. Also to provide the same amount of joy, progressively more and more amount of the input (food, sex, wine etc.) is required. Ultimately the inputs themselves would turn into scare resources initiating wars over their appropriation. So, should Eating, Drinking and being Merry be the purpose of life?

There is a more nuanced approach also, since mankind has existed continuously for the past 200,000 years and is unlikely to perish anytime soon ; shouldn’t a man who lives for less than a 100 years look for means which can somehow elongate his existence. The quest for immortality, the desire to be remembered for posterity, has fueled many hearts; manifesting itself in myriad ways.

Alexander tried conquering the world in ancient times. Vasco da Gama sailed into the unknown seas during the medieval era. Edmund Hilary in modern times scaled the world’s highest peak. The thread of striving for undying glory binds these seemingly unrelated personalities. But these very steps towards glory also led to millions being massacred by Alexander, naked plundering of India’s riches and the loss of lives while attempting to scale the Everest. Should then achieving glory be the purpose of life?

From Socrates drinking the cup of hemlock to Martin Luther King Jr. taking a bullet on his chest. There have always been people who have immortalized themselves by serving humanity at large and giving up their life in due course of service. These men lived their lives to uphold certain ideals they believed in. But in the same breath I must also add that there have been zealots like Hitler who ruined the world by their ruthless ideals .With ISIS also flashing an ideological batch; I must ask- Should the purpose of life be upholding certain ideals? 

There are, at least to my limited mind, no concrete or unconditional answers to any of the questions raised. Whether Sardar Khan is right in seeking revenge or not, I am not sure, my hunch would be as good as yours. But the thing to note here is that regardless of not having absolute answers these questions have been independently and repeatedly asked across time and space. From Ashoka to Alberto Camus, all men worth their salt, have presented their opinions on them.

Thus it’s incumbent upon us to ask these questions which are the very life and breath of our existence and to realize the fact that maybe the purpose of life is to have a life of purpose.